<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Thoughts on GOLIAH OF GATH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unorthodoxfaith.com/2010/11/01/some-thoughts-on-goliah-of-gath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unorthodoxfaith.com/2010/11/01/some-thoughts-on-goliah-of-gath/</link>
	<description>Journeys in history, faith and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://unorthodoxfaith.com/2010/11/01/some-thoughts-on-goliah-of-gath/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unorthodoxfaith.com/?p=1849#comment-2723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEPHILIM is a plural. You cannot have &quot;a nephilim&quot;. 

Also, NPL simply means &quot;amazing&quot; or &quot;unique&quot;. It is related to PLA in Akkadian.

But grammar and language aside, saying Goliath was one of the Nephilim requires an extrabiblical assertion. According to Genesis, the Nephilim were wiped out in Noah&#039;s flood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEPHILIM is a plural. You cannot have &#8220;a nephilim&#8221;. </p>
<p>Also, NPL simply means &#8220;amazing&#8221; or &#8220;unique&#8221;. It is related to PLA in Akkadian.</p>
<p>But grammar and language aside, saying Goliath was one of the Nephilim requires an extrabiblical assertion. According to Genesis, the Nephilim were wiped out in Noah&#8217;s flood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://unorthodoxfaith.com/2010/11/01/some-thoughts-on-goliah-of-gath/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unorthodoxfaith.com/?p=1849#comment-2722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spear head weight is massive. The spear heads of that time weighed around 1.1 pounds. http://www.academia.edu/1217073/Late_Bronze_and_Early_Iron_Age_Bronze_Spear-_and_Javelinheads_in_Bulgaria_in_the_Context_of_Southeastern_Europe No normal sized man used a 10-15 pound spear head. Try to lift and trust that much weight on a 8-15 foot long pole you couldn&#039;t do it. Goliath was a Nephilim a hybrid of human and celestial or fallen angels. So you can&#039;t compare him to pituitary gland giants of today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spear head weight is massive. The spear heads of that time weighed around 1.1 pounds. <a href="http://www.academia.edu/1217073/Late_Bronze_and_Early_Iron_Age_Bronze_Spear-_and_Javelinheads_in_Bulgaria_in_the_Context_of_Southeastern_Europe" rel="nofollow">http://www.academia.edu/1217073/Late_Bronze_and_Early_Iron_Age_Bronze_Spear-_and_Javelinheads_in_Bulgaria_in_the_Context_of_Southeastern_Europe</a> No normal sized man used a 10-15 pound spear head. Try to lift and trust that much weight on a 8-15 foot long pole you couldn&#8217;t do it. Goliath was a Nephilim a hybrid of human and celestial or fallen angels. So you can&#8217;t compare him to pituitary gland giants of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://unorthodoxfaith.com/2010/11/01/some-thoughts-on-goliah-of-gath/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unorthodoxfaith.com/?p=1849#comment-1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what you mean by &quot;clearest interpretation of the most reliable manuscript&quot; since there are no textual variants in this text that I know of. As for clarity of interpretation, we must always be cautious that our literalism is attached to the original languages and not to our English readings. 

All things considered, however, I agree in essence. He was a really big, scary dude.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by &#8220;clearest interpretation of the most reliable manuscript&#8221; since there are no textual variants in this text that I know of. As for clarity of interpretation, we must always be cautious that our literalism is attached to the original languages and not to our English readings. </p>
<p>All things considered, however, I agree in essence. He was a really big, scary dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcamomile</title>
		<link>http://unorthodoxfaith.com/2010/11/01/some-thoughts-on-goliah-of-gath/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcamomile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unorthodoxfaith.com/?p=1849#comment-1437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, thanks for the thoughtful overview and analysis of Goliath&#039;s size and that of his armament using the Hebrew text and translations of the weights and measures. I will stick with Goliath being about 9&#039;3&quot; as the clearest interpretation of the most reliable manuscript but the main point is that he was a really big and impressive dude.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the thoughtful overview and analysis of Goliath&#8217;s size and that of his armament using the Hebrew text and translations of the weights and measures. I will stick with Goliath being about 9&#8217;3&#8243; as the clearest interpretation of the most reliable manuscript but the main point is that he was a really big and impressive dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
